MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation of the potential promoting effect of 60 Hz magnetic fields on N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea induced neurogenic tumors in female F344 rats

2000· article· en· W4231106719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioelectromagnetics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalArmand Frappier MuseumMcGill UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBioPhage Pharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringIn uteroGestationMedicineCarcinogenSalinePregnancyToxicityPhysiologyNitrosoureaBody weightFetusInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyChemotherapyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study investigated the possible effect of 60 Hz magnetic fields (MFs) as promoters of neurogenic tumors initiated transplacentally by a chemical carcinogen, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). In a preliminary study, 5 mg of ENU was shown to induce 30 to 40% neurogenic tumors in F344 rats offspring after 420 days of observation. In the present study, 400 female rats were divided into eight different groups (50 animals/group) and exposed in utero (on day 18 of gestation) to a single intravenous dose of either Saline (Group I), or ENU, 5 mg/kg (Group II to VIII). Dams in group II were given no further treatment while dams in Groups III to VII were exposed to 5 different intensities of MFs forty eight hours later. Animals in group III were sham exposed (<0.02 μT) while groups IV to VII were exposed to 2, 20, 200, and 2000 μT, respectively. Dams in Group VIII were injected intraperitoneally with 12-O-tetradecanoylphrobol-13-acetate (TPA; 10 μg/kg) from day 19 until delivery, and then their female offspring continued to be injected every 15 days, starting at day 14 after birth until sacrifice (positive controls). Accordingly, this study included three different types of controls: Internal controls (Groups II and III) and positive control (Group VIII). Body weight, mortality and clinical observations were evaluated in all groups of animals during in-life exposure. Necropsy was performed on all exposed and control animals that died, were found moribund or sacrificed at termination of the study. Histopathological evaluation was done for all brains, spinal cords, cranial nerves, major organs (lungs, liver, spleen, kidneys, pituitary, thyroid and adrenals) and all gross lesions observed during necropsy. All clinical observations and pathological evaluations were conducted under “blinded” conditions. The findings from this ENU/MFs promotion study clearly demonstrate that, under our defined experimental conditions, exposure to 60 Hz linear (single axis) sinusoidal, continuous wave MFs had no effect on the survival of female F344 rats or on the number of animals bearing neurogenic tumors. These results suggest that MFs have no promoting effect on neurogenic tumors in the female F344 rats exposed transplacentally to ENU. Bioelectromagnetics 21:84–93, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it