Magnetic Compensation of Magnetic Noises Related to Aircraft's Maneuvers in Airborne Survey
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a variety of applications, magnetic data is collected from airborne platforms. Normally, this data is collected with sensors that measure the total field or amplitude of the magnetic vector data. New generations of optically pumped sensors are extremely sensitive with their sensitivity quoted often in picoteslas. At present, some new instrumentation is also attempting to measure high accuracy vector data. Despite the accuracy of modern sensors and data acquisition systems, the noise of the flying platform is still one of the limiting factors in obtaining highly accurate data. The aircraft or helicopter itself emanates magnetic signals. These signals are due to a number of factors including induced fields due to magnetically susceptible materials and permanent magnetic materials on the platforms as well as both induced electromagnetic signals and electromagnetic signals generated either by electrical systems or moving parts such as rotors. This subject of this paper are problems and techniques related to removing the effects of the moving platform as well as attempts to study the subject with the use of simulated data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it