Identification of the S6 kinase activity stimulated in quiescent brine shrimp embryos upon entry to preemergence development as p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase: Isolation of <i>Artemia franciscana</i> p70<sup>S6k</sup> cDNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously demonstrated that a protein kinase responsible for phosphorylating 40S ribosomal subunits is activated in quiescent Artemia franciscana embryos within 15 min of restoration of normal tonicity and incubation at 30°C. Here, we identify the activated S6 kinase as A. franciscana p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6k) subsequent to the isolation of an Artemia p70S6k cDNA. The protein conceptually translated from cDNA has 70% similarity and 64% identity to both Drosophila melanogaster and human p70S6k. Southern blot analysis is consistent with presence of a single p70S6k gene. Two transcripts of 5.4 and 2.7 kb were found. Abundance of both mRNAs increased dramatically around 4 h of preemergence development, and exhibited different steady-state level variation thereafter. Stimulated S6 kinase activity, partially purified by Superose 6 chromatography, correlated best with the slowest migrating, ~65 kDa, form detected by Western analysis using a specific polyclonal antibody made to a peptide from the predicted p70S6k NH2-terminus. Furthermore, the A. franciscana p70S6k was immunoprecipitated with the same antibody, showing in parallel an S6 kinase activity similar to peak profiles. We conclude that the stimulated S6 kinase activity is that of an ortholog of human p70S6k that may be involved in the regulation of protein synthesis during preemergence development in A. franciscana species.Key Words: p70 ribosomal S6 kinase cDNA, brine shrimp, development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".