Pursuit of sexual function post-radical prostatectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: In the event of the implementation of prostate cancer screening, younger men will be diagnosed more frequently. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a frequent long-term complication in men post-radical prostatectomy (RP). Since the introduction of RP, urologists have strived to improve postoperative sexual function. There is little literature, however, in the area of ED prescribing and sexual pursuit in men post-RP. We assessed the pursuit of sexual function in this group of patients.Methods: The study involved a detailed questionnaire sent to patients who have undergone radical retropublic prostatectomy (RRP) by one surgeon in one institution to ascertain the impact of ED on lifestyle and ED therapy prescription use.Results: There was a response rate of 59%; most patients who responded were in the 61 to 70 year age group at the time of the survey. About 25% of patients had intercourse more than once in the 4 weeks prior to the survey. A total 50% of patients had no problem or a very small problem with their sexual function. Overall 80% of patients were prescribed ED therapy, but less than 35% of them used it.Conclusion: Sexual frequency peaked in younger patients who were 3 years or more from surgery. Of note, 46% of men either declined the offer of ED therapy or got the prescription and never used it. Only 34% of men had used their ED prescription in the last 4 weeks. Urologists frequently find that patients behave differently postoperatively, with less interest in sexual activity. Interestingly, we found that 50% of our patients classified their sexual function, as at most a small problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".