MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231130570 · doi:10.18356/62e906c5-en

Colombia

2011· book-chapter· en· W4231130570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic survey of Latin America and the Caribbean · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Politics in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)Quarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)AgricultureBusinessConsumer confidence indexEconomic policyEconomyEconomic growthEconomicsFinanceGeographyMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Colombian economy grew by 4.3% in 2010, exceeding expectations; and there are clear indications that the upswing recorded in the final quarter of the year will continue throughout 2011. The economic strategy pursued by the government of President Santos, who took office in August 2010, focuses on five key sectors that have been identified as engines of economic growth: innovation, agriculture, transport infrastructure, mining and housing. The unusually heavy rainfall seen since the second half of 2010 has so far not affected the performance of trade and industry or the business and consumer confidence indices, which in early 2011 were up on the previous year. However, in dealing with the severe weather situation and rebuilding hard-hit economic and social infrastructure, care will need to be taken not to undermine efforts to maintain a healthy fiscal position. Against this backdrop, ECLAC forecasts growth of around 5.3% in 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1330.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic survey of Latin America and the CaribbeanSame topicHistory and Politics in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207