MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231144766 · doi:10.1086/ahr/109.2.488

Christopher Price. <i>Britain, America and Rearmament in the 1930s: The Cost of Failure</i>. New York: Palgrave. 2001. Pp. xvi, 228. $65.00

2004· article· en· W4231144766 on OpenAlexaffabout
John Ferris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryEconomic historyPolitical economyClassicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Christopher Price. Britain, America and Rearmament in the 1930s: The Cost of Failure. New York: Palgrave. 2001. Pp. xvi, 228. $65.00 Get access Price Christopher. Britain, America and Rearmament in the 1930s: The Cost of Failure. New York: Palgrave. 2001. Pp. xvi, 228. $65.00. John Ferris John Ferris University of Calgary Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Historical Review, Volume 109, Issue 2, April 2004, Pages 488–489, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/109.2.488 Published: 01 April 2004

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicMilitary and Defense StudiesFrench-language works237,207