MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231165453 · doi:10.1109/wsc.1999.816801

Application of simulation in trenchless renewal of underground urban infrastructure

2003· article· en· W4231165453 on OpenAlexaffabout
J.S. Lueke, S.T. Ariaratnam, S.M. AbouRizk

Bibliographic record

VenueWSC'99. 1999 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings. 'Simulation - A Bridge to the Future' (Cat. No.99CH37038) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivil engineeringTrenchless technologyEngineeringCitationLibrary sciencePipeline transportComputer scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article Free Access Share on Application of simulation in trenchless renewal of underground urban infrastructure Authors: Jason S. Lueke Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 220 Civil/Electrical Engineering Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada T6G 2G7 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 220 Civil/Electrical Engineering Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada T6G 2G7View Profile , Samuel T. Ariaratnam Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 220 Civil/Electrical Engineering Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada T6G 2G7 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 220 Civil/Electrical Engineering Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada T6G 2G7View Profile , Simaan M. AbouRizk Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 220 Civil/Electrical Engineering Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada T6G 2G7 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 220 Civil/Electrical Engineering Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada T6G 2G7View Profile Authors Info & Claims WSC '99: Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future - Volume 2December 1999 Pages 929–936https://doi.org/10.1145/324898.324931Published:01 December 1999Publication History 6citation279DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations6Total Downloads279Last 12 Months18Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWSC'99. 1999 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings. 'Simulation - A Bridge to the Future' (Cat. No.99CH37038)Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207