Akuttherapie des ischämischen Schlaganfalls
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measures for the handling of strokepatients can be commenced only if the diagnosis is confirmed by imaging procedures and initial information about the etiology is present. Up to this time and also in the subsequent period, stabilization of vital-parameters represents the basis for all therapeutic procedures. At present, thrombolysis is the only approved specific therapy for ischemic stroke. The use of rtPA is approved within the USA (1996), Canada (1998), and since 2000 also in Germany for intravenous therapy within 3 hours after symptom onset with numerous restrictions. In some centers thrombolytic therapy is per-formed as a non-standard therapy for individual patiens also. in an extended 3-6 hours Mt: f,fIn such cas 774tillirf anglta for the patients should be insured, e.g. using Stroke MRI with diffusion and perfusion-weighted sequences and MRA. Nevertheless it has to be considered that thrombolytic therapy is and will remain an option for a minority of all strokepatients. Education about symptoms and the emergency character of the disease are important to increase this proportion.The early secondary prevention after ischemic stroke is still a controversial topic. Some trials revealed that the comedication of lowdose Heparin s.c. and ASS is particularly effective for the avoidance of recurrent stroke, combined with a low bleeding risk. Nevertheless some indications for treatment with i.v. Heparin remain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it