Synthesis and characterization of ferrocenyl stannanes and polyferrocenyl stannanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel polymer polybis(dimethyl stannyl)ferrocene was synthesized through both metal catalyzed intermolecular dehydrogenative condensation and ring-opening polymerization. This polymer was the first evidence of a dibridged polyferrocenyl stannane, and was found to be of low to moderate molecular weight by gel permation chromatography and 1H NMR spectroscopy. This polymer displayed extensive electronic communication observed previously synthesized monobridged ferrocenyl stannane polymers. The first tristanna-bridged 3.3]ferrocenophane was discovered through an amine coupling of a tin amine, and 1,1’bis(dimethyl stannyl) ferrocene. The [3.3]ferrocenophane displayed a strong interaction between connected ferrocenes despite the large distance, (8.49 Å) between Fe centers. Finally, a new and improved synthesis of 1,1,2,2-tetramethyldistanna-[2]ferrocenophane was found. This metal catalyzed intramolecular dehydrogenative coupling employs Pd2(dba)3 as a catalyst and yields 90% product. All products were characterized where possible 1H, 13C, and 119Sn NMR and UV-Visible spectrocopy, as well as through cyclic voltammetry and DFT modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".