MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231224646 · doi:10.1109/bigcomp.2018.00054

Optimization Method of Residual Networks of Residual Networks for Image Classification

2018· article· en· W4231224646 on OpenAlex
Ke Zhang, Liru Guo, Ce Gao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsResidualComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activation of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network that overlooks the diversity of datasets has been restricting its development in image classification. In this paper, we propose a Residual Networks of Residual Networks(RoR) optimization method. Firstly, three activation functions (ReLU, ELU and PELU) are applied to RoR and can provide more effective optimization methods for different datasets; Secondly, we added a drop-path to avoid over-fitting and widened RoR adding filters to avoid gradient vanish. Our networks achieved good classification accuracy in CIFAR-10/100 datasets, and the best test errors were 3.52 % and 19.07% on CIFAR-10/100, respectively. The experiments prove that the RoR network optimization method can improve network performance, and effectively restrain the vanishing/exploding gradients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207