MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231280640 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.13019

Alessandro Galante Garrone, Franco Venturi, Vivere eguali. Dialoghi inediti intorno a Filippo Buonarroti

2013· article· fr· W4231280640 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Pia Donato

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenturi effectGeologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

est à l'origine de ce volume.Pour honorer à la fois leur oeuvre d'historien et leur amitié, Manuela Albertone a choisi le thème des études sur Filippo Buonarroti que les deux historiens ont partagé pendant toute une vie et qui était aussi apte à illustrer les liens et les correspondances entre recherche historique et lutte politique en Italie dans la période qui va des années trente aux années soixante, et au-delà.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207