MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PTH-067 Incidental Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in A British Bowel Cancer Screening Cohort: 6-Year Clinical Outcome of The First Reported Cohort

2016· article· en· W4231331697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John A. Scott, Uche Nosegbe, Rhys O. Butcher, Atta M. Abbasi, Roger Prudham, R George, Jimmy K. Limdi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineUlcerative colitisCohortColonoscopyPancolitisCrohn's diseaseColorectal cancerRetrospective cohort studyCancerGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The UK Bowel Cancer Screening programme (BCSP) was launched in 2006 in England and Wales, screening individuals aged 60–69 years with a Faecal Occult Blood test (FOBt) followed by a screening colonoscopy if FOBt positive. We reported the first ever experience of incidental diagnosis of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) through screening in 2012. We present a 6 year follow-up of this cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective case record review of clinical outcomes until 31st December 2015 for patients diagnosed with IBD from the BCSP from April 2008 until September 2011. We reviewed their symptoms at diagnosis, treatment course and compared stage of disease at initial presentation to that at last follow-up. Results Between April 2008 and September 2011, 136,811 patients were invited to the BCSP and 67,485 were screened with a 49.33% uptake and FOBt positivity of 2.02%. Colonoscopy was performed in 1401 patients and 13 patients (3 female) were diagnosed with IBD. Of these, 6 patients had Ulcerative colitis (UC), 5 had Crohn’s disease (CD), 2 had IBD-unclassified (IBDU). One IBDU patient was subsequently re-classified as UC during follow-up. At diagnosis 7 (53.8%) patients were asymptomatic. An asymptomatic patient died of an unrelated cause, with follow-up data available for 12 patients. Median follow-up time was 80 months (range 39–87 months). Using the Montreal classification the distribution for UC included E1 (2), E2 (2) and E3 (2) and in CD showed L2 (7). Four CD patients had B1 disease and 1 had B2. Disease progressed in 2 patients and all 6 (100%) asymptomatic patients developed symptoms during follow-up. Treatment included steroids (10), 5 ASA (12), Azathioprine (6); Methotrexate (1) and Anti-TNF (Infliximab (2); Adalimumab (1)). Median time to immunomodulator was 29.5 months and to anti-TNF, 28.0 months. Mean CRP at diagnosis for those who progressed to Immunomodulator was 10.4 compared to 5.5 in those that didn’t and 15.5 in those that required biologics. A patient with symptomatic IBDU underwent subtotal colectomy 54 months after diagnosis but died 7 days post-operatively. Another patient died at 39 months from an unrelated cause. Conclusion Incidental diagnosis of IBD presents an important model for the study of early disease. A proportion of initially asymptomatic patients demonstrate disease progression with a rapid requirement for treatment escalation. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→