Neonatal Escherichia coli infections: concerns regarding resistance to current therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently recommended antibiotic treatment of suspected neonatal sepsis is ampicillin and an aminoglycoside. Recently, we observed increasing ampicillin and gentamicin resistance in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from neonates at our institution. We therefore reviewed clinical and laboratory records of all neonates with systemic infection, hospitalized from 1994 through 1998, from whom E. coli was isolated from blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid. The influence of perinatal variables (e.g. rupture of foetal membranes > 24 h, group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization, urinary tract infection during pregnancy and the use of antepartum and/or intrapartum antibiotics), and neonatal variables (e.g. gestational age, age at onset of sepsis (early: 72h, late: >72h), number of E. coli septic recurrences, and associated underlying medical and/or surgical conditions) on antimicrobial susceptibilities of invasive E. coli isolates was studied. Twenty‐three neonates with invasive E. coli infection were identified; most [19 (83%)] presented as late‐onset sepsis (LOS). Ampicillin‐resistant E. coli were isolated in 75% and 53% of neonates in the early‐ and late‐onset groups, respectively. Gentamicin resistance was found in 50% of early‐onset sepsis (EOS) isolates compared with 16% in the late‐onset group. Isolates from two neonates with EOS were resistant to both ampicillin and gentamicin. One neonate with EOS and three with LOS had recurrent E. coli sepsis; all isolates were ampicillin‐resistant and one was gentamicin‐resistant. All these neonates were initially treated with ampicillin and gentamicin. Both groups had associated underlying medical and/or surgical conditions (50% early‐onset, 47% late‐onset). Maternal GBS colonization occurred in 2 (50%) versus 3 (16%) of EOS and LOS cases, respectively. All GBS colonized women received intrapartum ampicillin prior to delivery. Conclusions: Ampicillin and gentamicin resistance is emerging in neonatal E. coli isolates from invasive infection. Current empiric management of neonatal sepsis requires re‐evaluation given changing antimicrobial susceptibilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".