Scale-Free Graph Processing on a NUMA Machine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern shared-memory systems embrace the NUMA architecture which has proven to be more scalable than the SMP architecture. In many ways, a NUMA system resembles a shared-nothing distributed system: physically distinct processing units and memory regions. Memory accesses to remote NUMA domains are more expensive than local accesses. This poses the opportunity to transfer the know-how and design of distributed graph processing to develop shared-memory graph processing solutions optimized for NUMA systems. To this end, we explore if a distributed-memory like middleware that makes graph partitioning and communication between partitions explicit, can improve the performance on a NUMA system. We design and implement a NUMA aware graph processing framework that embraces design philosophies of distributed graph processing system: in particular explicit partitioning and inter-partition communication, and at the same time exploits optimization opportunities specific to single-node systems. We demonstrate up to 13.9x speedup over a state-of-the-art NUMA-aware framework, Polymer and up to 3.7x scalability on a four-socket NUMA machine using graphs with tens of billions of edges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it