Preliminary Review of Oil Spill Risk and Response Capability of PETRONAS International Exploration & Production Facilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preliminary Review of Oil Spill Risk and Response Capability of PETRONAS International Exploration & Production Facilities Tzee Wan Lee; Tzee Wan Lee Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar M. Radzuan b. Yusof; M. Radzuan b. Yusof Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Asul Kahar Muda Asul Kahar Muda Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86763-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86763-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Lee, Tzee Wan, b. Yusof, M. Radzuan, and Asul Kahar Muda. "Preliminary Review of Oil Spill Risk and Response Capability of PETRONAS International Exploration & Production Facilities." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86763-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractAspiring to be a leading International E&P company of choice, PCSB takes on the responsibility to protect the environment wherever it operates. The company sees a need to understand and effectively manage the risk of oil spill arising from its various E&P facilities located all over the world. The risk of oil spill was assessed based on the probability of occurrence and the consequence or severity of the spill. The severity of the spill is defined by oil exposure volume, relevant legislative requirement of the host country of operations, environmental sensitivity and stakeholders' perception which has a direct impact on the reputation of the company. To ensure the risk of oil spill at each facility is minimized to as low as reasonably practicable level, the company developed a set of oil spill response capability requirement based on risk level.IntroductionPETRONAS Carigali Sdn. Bhd. (PCSB), the E&P arm of PETRONAS - the national petroleum corporateion in Malaysia, started to venture overseas since the early nineties and has intensified to expand its international business for the last ten years. To date, PCSB is engaged in various phases of upstream activities in 25 countries as shown in Fig. 1.The company sees a need to understand and effectively manage the risk of oil spill arising from its E&P facilities located in various parts of the world. The adequacy of oil spill response management at each operation needs to be assessed. To do this, the company has commissioned an in-house study team to first conduct a preliminary review of oil spill risk and response capability of all its Exploration & Production facilities outside Malaysia. A review was conducted for facilities within Malaysia earlier. Keywords: personnel, assessment, oil spill risk, arrangement, oil spill, petronas international exploration, contingency planning, upstream oil & gas, availability, response capability Subjects: HSSE & Social Responsibility Management, Environment, Contingency planning and emergency response, Oil and chemical spills This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".