The Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid Type 1 Ion Channel in Hypometabolic Response to Hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When challenged with low levels of available oxygen (hypoxia), larger mammals, including humans, attempt to maintain a consistent oxygen supply by increasing their rate of respiration. Smaller rodents and newborn mammals, on the other hand, respond to hypoxia by curtailing oxygen consumption. This latter process (hypoxic hypometabolism) involves actively regulated reductions in both metabolic rate and body temperature (3; 4; 9). Despite more than 50 years of investigation, the molecular mechanisms of this intriguing process are still unclear. Recently, the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptor (best known for its response to capsaicin) has been implicated in the regulation of body temperature (5). Evidence includes the ability of TRPV1 receptor agonists and antagonists to lower and raise body temperature respectively (6; 7), as well as a demonstrated site of action within thehypothalamus (the area of the brain responsible for the regulation of body temperature) (1; 2). Based on the parallel but separately identified roles of hypoxia and TRPV1 in controlling body temperature, we reasoned that the TRPV1 ion channel may be implicated in hypoxia-induced alterations in body temperature. This present study investigates the potential involvement of the TRPV1 ion channel in hypoxia mediated hypothermia by comparing the hypoxic responses of wild-type mice and transgenetic knockout animals lacking a functional TRPV1 gene. We hypothesize that the TRPV1 knockout animals will show a blunted hypothermic response to hypoxic challenge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".