MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acknowledgements

2014· other· en· W4231547832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmentalismEnvironmental movementPublishingEnvironmental justiceCollective actionPolitical scienceLegitimacySustainabilityEmeraldPoliticsEarth SummitEnvironmental ethicsGeographySociologySustainable developmentLawEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2014), "Acknowledgements", Occupy the Earth: Global Environmental Movements (Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice, Vol. 15), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. vii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-503020140000015014 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited The editors would like to thank their friends and families for their support during the making of this book. We would also like to thank all of the contributors, and Commissioning Editor Aimee Nixon and the Emerald Group team. This book is dedicated to our children, in the hope that they may see a better future. Book Chapters Occupy the Earth: Global Environmental Movements Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice Occupy the Earth: Global Environmental Movements Copyright Page Acknowledgements List of Contributors Introduction One Global Movement, Many Local Voices: Discourse(s) of the Global Anti-Fracking Movement Japan’s Evolving Civic Environmentalism Environmental Protest in Ireland Locating Environmental Knowledge in Antipollution Movements of Northern India The Mayangna Resolve to Save the Rainforest, their Homelands Environmental Campaigns in Israel and their Spatial Impacts Exploring Ideology as a ‘Resource’ for Environmental Justice Activism: Reflections from the Anti-GMO Movement in France The Art of Contestation and Legitimacy: Environment, Customary Communities, and Activism in Indonesia From Disparate Action to Collective Mobilization: Collective Action Frames and the Canadian Food Movement Implications of the Environmental Justice Movement on Redistributive Urban Politics: An Example from Megacity Dhaka, Bangladesh Spiritual Ecology as an International Environmental Movement Bird Hunting in European Malta: A Case of ENGO Empowerment? About the Contributors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2060.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207