MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231555618 · doi:10.1787/gov_glance-2017-89-fr

La qualité des soins de santé

2017· book-chapter· fr· W4231555618 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePanorama des administrations publiques · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development Canada
FundersOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chaque jour, les prestataires de soins de santé doivent prendre en charge un large éventail de problèmes de santé, parmi lesquels les maladies infectieuses, les maladies chroniques et les maladies et blessures mettant en jeu la vie du patient. Les maladies cardiovasculaires (y compris les crises cardiaques et les accidents vasculaires cérébraux, entre autres) et les différents types de cancers font partie des problèmes de santé les plus répandus et les plus graves au sein de la zone OCDE. Il s’agit, de loin, des deux principales causes de décès dans les pays de l’OCDE : les différentes maladies cardiovasculaires et les différents types de cancers sont à l’origine, respectivement, d’environ le tiers et le quart de l’ensemble des décès. S’il est peut-être possible de réduire la survenance des problèmes cardiovasculaires et des cancers en redoublant d’efforts de prévention (dans le cadre de la lutte contre la consommation de tabac, par exemple), les systèmes de santé ont un rôle majeur à jouer dans la détection précoce de ces problèmes de santé et dans la fourniture rapide de traitements efficaces quand ces problèmes sont diagnostiqués.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePanorama des administrations publiquesSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207