Generation of murine dendritic cells from flt3-ligand–supplemented bone marrow cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Murine dendritic cells (DCs) can be classified into at least 2 subsets, “myeloid-related” (CD11bbright, CD8α−) and “lymphoid-related” (CD11bdull, CD8α+), but the absolute relationship between the 2 remains unclear. Methods of generating DCs from bone marrow (BM) precursors in vitro typically employ granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as the principal growth factor, and the resultant DCs exhibit a myeloidlike phenotype. Here we describe a flt3-ligand (FL)–dependent BM culture system that generated DCs with more diverse phenotypic characteristics. Murine BM cells cultured at high density in recombinant human FL for 9 days developed into small lymphoid-sized cells, most of which expressed CD11c, CD86, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II. The CD11c+ population could be divided into 2 populations on the basis of the level of expression of CD11b, which may represent the putative myeloid- and lymphoid-related subsets. The FL in vitro–derived DCs, when treated with interferon-α or lipopolysaccharide during the final 24 hours of culture, expressed an activated phenotype that included up-regulation of MHC class II, CD1d, CD8α, CD80, CD86, and CD40. The FL-derived DCs also exhibited potent antigen-processing and antigen-presenting capacity. Neutralizing anti–interleukin-6 (IL-6) antibody, but not anti–GM-CSF, significantly reduced the number of DCs generated in vitro with FL, suggesting that IL-6 has a role in the development of DCs from BM precursors. Stem cell factor, which exhibits some of the same bioactivities as FL, was unable to replace FL to promote DC development in vitro. This culture system will facilitate detailed analysis of murine DC development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".