MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231580066 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2020.3013552

IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics publication information

2020· article· en· W4231580066 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas K. Fontaine, Anna C. Peacock, Nobuhiko Nishiyama, Seb J. Savory, Mark R. Hutchinson, M. Suzuki, Stephen E. Ralph, Jianquan Yao, A. Kasukawa, Leif Katsuo Oxenløwe, M Mashanovitch, M Sander, Officers Menoni, Dan M. Marom, C. Jagadish, Douglas Razzano, F Garcia-Gunning, Membership Shum, Conferences Li, Administration Hawkins, I Rusch, Gabriella Bosco, Kent D. Choquette, Gabriella Cincotti, P Iannonie, Byeong Ha Lee, Christopher R. Williams, Toshio Fukuda, Susan Kathy, Land, Kathleen Kramer, Joseph Lillie, M Moura, Stephen Phillips, Keka Sarkar, Kukjin Chun, Robert Fish, James Conrad, Alfred Al" Dunlop, Stepehen Welby, Thomas Siegert, Business Administration, Julie Cozin, Corporate Governance, Donna Hourican, Jamie Moesch, Sophia Muirhead, Lauren Bell, Chris Brantley, Ieee-Usa Cherif, Karen Hawkins, Cecelia Jankowski, Geographic Activities, Konstantinos Karachalios, Mary Ward-Callan, Dawn Melley, Kevin Lisankie, Peter Tuohy, Jeffrey Cichocki, Neelam Khinsavara, Patrick Kempf

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronicsQuantum opticsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsEngineering physicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3680.147

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Quantum ElectronicsSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207