MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231585764 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14653947.v1

Self-consolidating concrete : rheology, fresh properties and structural behaviour

2021· preprint· en· W4231585764 on OpenAlexaff
Vasilios Bill Lambros

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheologyMaterials scienceSelf-consolidating concreteAggregate (composite)MortarComposite materialReinforcementCementShear (geology)Structural engineeringCompressive strengthEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-consolidating concrete (SCC) is known for its excellent deformability, high resistance to segregation and bleeding and can be obtained by incorporating viscosity modifying agents (VMA). Identifying and proposing a new low-cost VMA, and developing and testing the fresh and mechanical properties of such a concrete are essential. This thesis presents the performance of four new polysaccharide-based VMAs in enhancing the rheological and fresh properties of cement paste, mortar and concrete. An experimental study on the structural properties of two SCC and one normal concrete (NC) mixtures with varying proportions of coarse aggregate content (713-1030 kg/m 3 ) and maximum aggregate size (12 and 19-mm) is presented. Eighteen reinforced concrete beams were tested to study the comparative shear resistance of SCC and NC. Sixteen SCC and NC filled steel tube columns with and without additional steel reinforcement were tested. A design equation for peak load capacity of CFST columns is proposed and validated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207