MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231594617 · doi:10.5342/michhistrevi.36.1.132

Review

2010· article· en· W4231594617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allen W. Trelease

Bibliographic record

VenueMichigan Historical Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShorePeninsulaArchaeologyGeographyIndex (typography)HistoryOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

132 Michigan Historical Review John Gaertner. The Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway: A History of the Lake Superior District’s Pioneer Iron Ore Hauler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009. Pp. 349. Appendix. Bibliography. Illustrations. Index. Maps. Notes. Cloth, $49.95. Formed in 1887 from earlier short-line railroads, the Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway (DSS&A) served Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and northern Wisconsin until it was merged into the Soo Line in 1961. At its most extensive, it ran from Duluth, Minnesota, through northern Wisconsin to Sault Ste. Marie and St. Ignace, Michigan. The latter towns were as close as it ever got to the Atlantic seaboard. The road was controlled through nearly all of its history by the Canadian Pacific Railroad, which treated it as something of a stepchild. As the book’s subtitle indicates, the DSS&A served the Upper Peninsula’s iron fields but it also carried the region’s timber products and passengers as well. Competing with other roads for the traffic of a thinly populated territory, it seldom made money. When the area’s iron and timber resources became depleted and highways increasingly cut into passenger and freight traffic, the road frequently trimmed its services and trackage. It never became part of an intercontinental trunk line as its promoters occasionally hoped. The Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway is a business history written from management’s point of view. Labor and community relations are seldom mentioned. The text, moreover, is exceedingly dense. John Gaertner has done a more than commendable job of research into the road’s records and related sources. He has produced a reference book that no one should ever need to duplicate. But there is a serious forest vs. trees problem: seventy-four years of relentless operational detail are so rarely leavened by summary or evaluation that the book is a burden to read. Of great help, on the other hand, are the maps amply distributed throughout the book, something that cannot be said of every railroad history. There are many illustrations as well, primarily of rolling stock. And finally there is an appendix containing for the years 1886 to 1960 a complete locomotive roster; a fifteen-page list of all stations with the years in which they operated; and a year-by-year list of operating statistics—including miles covered, earnings, expenses, passengers carried, and freight tonnage moved. John Gaertner has done this part of his work very well indeed. Allen W. Trelease University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Emeritus ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMichigan Historical ReviewSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207