OC-0191: IAEA randomised trial of optimal single dose radiotherapy in the treatment of painful bone metastases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S963rd ESTRO Forum 2015 staging occurred, but were not different by study arm.Surgical resection rate was 49/71 in A, and 43/71 in B, with total margin status of 83 R0, 6 R1 and 3 R2, which by study arm was A 45:2:2 and B 38:4:1, p=0.6.Grades of AE, stomarelated events, non-stoma-related surgical complications, and lab work were similar.Conclusions: Differences in surgical resection rates (69% vs. 60%), R0 pathological margins (62% vs. 52%), and overall survival (63% and 55%) were not statistically significant, while relative safety was demonstrated for short-course RT.With a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, the preliminary results of this trial do not show a significant difference between randomization arms.An operability rate of 60% is important for a group of patients deemed inoperable/borderline at diagnosis in this group of developing countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".