MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231610184 · doi:10.1161/circ.133.suppl_1.mp87

Abstract MP87: Achieving Multiple Lifestyle Behaviour Targets Reduces the Risk of Hypertension in Adolescents

2016· article· en· W4231610184 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonathan McGavock, Valerie Carson

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortCardiovascular healthDemographyGerontologyPhysical therapyProspective cohort studyRefined grainsHealthy eatingPhysical activityEnvironmental healthDiseaseInternal medicineWhole grains

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The benefits of achieving multiple lifestyle behaviour targets on cardiovascular disease risk, in adolescents, remains unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that (1) achieving a composite of healthy lifestyle behaviour targets would be associated with a reduced risk of hypertension and (2) the relative risk reduction observed when multiple lifestyle behaviour targets were achieved would be greater than the sum of individual targets among adolescents. Design and Methods: We analysed data from a convenience sample of 394 adolescents 9-15 years enrolled in a 2-year prospective cohort study. The main exposure variable was a composite measure of achieving daily behavioural lifestyle targets for: (1) physical activity (>60 mins of MVPA daily-Actical Accelerometer); (2) fitness (>40th centile for age sex- 20m shuttle run test); (3) diet quality (meeting daily intake for food groups from Canada’s Food Guide to Healthy Eating: vegetables and fruits, grain products, milk and alternatives, and meats and alternatives); (4) sodium intake (<2.3g/day-24hr dietary recall); and (5) weight status (healthy weight status for age and sex-assessed directly using digital scale and stadiometer). The primary outcome was hypertension treated as a binary outcome (>90th centile for age, sex and height) measured in triplicate, seated, according to American Heart Association guidelines. Results: Hypertension developed in 13.7% (n=54) of youth at follow-up. Only 3% (n=13) of adolescents in the cohort met all 5 behavioural lifestyle targets. Hypertension was evident in 13.9% (n=53) of youth that did not meet all 5 lifestyle targets and 7.7% (n=1) of youth that did (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.07-4.1). Achieving at least 3 behavioural targets was associated with a 67% reduced odds of hypertension (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16-0.68). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, healthy weight status was the only significant individual behavioural target associated with incident hypertension (OR: 0.17; 95% 0.08-0.38). Conclusion: Very few adolescents meet all current behavioural lifestyle targets for preventing cardiovascular disease. Achieving multiple lifestyle targets, particularly healthy weight status, is associated with a significantly reduced odds of hypertension among adolescents. Experimental trials, in adolescents, are needed to determine the efficacy of achieving multiple behavioural lifestyle targets for reducing cardiovascular risk factors, to confirm these observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicHealth and Lifestyle Studies→French-language works237,207→