MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231644074 · doi:10.1121/1.3385011

Three-dimensional source tracking in an uncertain environment via Bayesian marginalization.

2010· article· en· W4231644074 on OpenAlexaff
Dag Tollefsen, Stan E. Dosso

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGibbs samplingSource trackingRange (aeronautics)Bayesian probabilityComputer scienceSampling (signal processing)Bearing (navigation)A priori and a posterioriGeologyMarginal distributionAlgorithmStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops a non-linear Bayesian marginalization approach for three-dimensional source tracking in shallow water with uncertain environmental properties, with application to horizontal line array (HLA) data. The algorithm integrates the posterior probability density via a combination of Metropolis–Hastings sampling over environmental and bearing model parameters and Gibbs sampling over source range and depth, with a priori track constraints on source velocity. Two-dimensional marginal distributions for source range/depth and range/bearing are derived. The Viterbi algorithm is applied to obtain the most probable track, with uncertainties estimated from the marginal distributions. The algorithm is applied to simulated data in continental shelf environment and to towed-source and ship-noise data recorded on a HLA deployed on the seafloor in an experiment conducted in the Barents Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicUnderwater Acoustics Research→French-language works237,207→