Entre recherche, pratique et politique : le Conseil supérieur de l’éducation du Québec, une démarche originale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, nous faisons état d’un processus original et unique de co-construction des savoirs en éducation. Nous tentons de cerner le jeu des rapports entre la recherche comme démarche de production de savoirs savants, les interventions des acteurs du système d’éducation, porteurs de savoirs pratiques et l’élaboration de politiques publiques au sein de l’appareil gouvernemental. Pour ce faire, nous analysons le mode de travail propre au Conseil supérieur de l’éducation, un conseil aviseur au ministre de l’Éducation du gouvernement du Québec. Nous présentons des exemples qui permettent d’expliciter le jeu des rapports entre ces trois éléments et nous concluons par quelques pistes susceptibles de les consolider tout en montrant les difficultés d’évaluer son pouvoir d’influence auprès des décideurs politiques et de la société civile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".