MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231678435 · doi:10.47062/1190.0202.03

ISOLATION OF FUNGUS FROM ROOTS OF WATER HYACINTH AND CELLULASE PRODUCTION BY THE MICROORGANISM FROM CARDBOARD WASTE

2020· article· en· W4231678435 on OpenAlexaff
Sumit Sharma, Saurabh Sarma, Satinder Kaur Brar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environment and Health Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Industry and Aquatic Biology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordscardboardHyacinthCellulaseIsolation (microbiology)FungusMicroorganismBiologyPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceMicrobiologyBotanyWaste managementCelluloseBacteriaEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bioethanol production from agro-industrial waste is becoming a major research area for alternative fuel. The cellulase enzyme is the key ingredient used for the cellulosic bioethanol fermentation process. India is abundant in cellulosic resources that come from paper and pulp industries. Single-use newspaper and packaging cardboards constitute a significant portion of cellulosic wastes. Here in this study, an industrial enzyme cellulase was produced from single-use newspaper and cardboard wastes. Afungus was isolated (THS8) from the root of the water hyacinth collected from an abundant pond located near Badoli village, Faridabad (India). The fungus was used to do a comparative study for cellulase production by using different substrates such as pure carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), cardboard (CB), coated cardboard (CBC) and newspaper (NP). The maximum cellulase activity 0.149 FPU (Filter paper unit)/ml was estimated in cardboard (20g/l) grown in MW (Mandel Weber) medium. Likewise, a total of 60% degradation of the cardboard was observed after 7 days of incubation at 30°C with 0.27 FPU/ml optimized at CB 20g/l. This demonstrates the feasibility of using cardboard as a less expensive feedstock, which is usually dumped after unpacking items in households and industries, to produce cellulase enzyme by the isolated microorganism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environment and Health SciencesSame topicFood Industry and Aquatic BiologyFrench-language works237,207