MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231706136 · doi:10.24124/2014/bpgub1672

A sexual health curriculum for northern Catholic youth

2014· dissertation· en· W4231706136 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Nicholas J. Vienneau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsUnit (ring theory)CurriculumSexual ethicsReproductive healthCompassionCriticismRelation (database)PopulationSociologyPsychologyPedagogyGender studiesMedicinePolitical scienceHuman sexualityLawMathematics educationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a rationale and an eight lesson unit plan for sexual health for grade six Yukon Catholic school students. The unit plan is designed to integrate Catholic teachings with BC and Yukon sexual health curriculum outcomes. The author addresses a concern that Catholic school teachers may be reluctant to teach the sexual health curriculum because of fear of conflict with church teachings or criticism from parents. However, research shows that Canada's northern populations are the most at-risk population for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) and early pregnancy ... This unit was designed to give students knowledge and decision-making tools for maintaining sexual health as they enter their most vulnerable years. Although Catholic teaching and safe practices for sex outside of marriage seem irreconcilable, these lessons emphasize the gospel values of love, justice, and compassion in relation to sexual health education. --Leaf ii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→