Hubungan Tingkat Pengetahuan tentang Perubahan Fisiologis dan Psikologis Fase Premenopouse terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan pada Pralansia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge was the resulted of human sensing that strongly influenced by the intensity of attention and object perception. Anxiety was a felt of fear that was not clear and not supported by the situation. This study aims to determine the relationship betwen level of knowledge about physiological and psychological changes in premenopausal phase and level of anxiety in pre-old woman. This research was quantitative design with cross-sectional. Total sample in this study are 90 premenopausal women who experience pre-old women at Working Area of Health Public Center in Pekanbaru, used purposive sampling technique. Data was analyzed with univariate and bivariate frequency distributions with chi-square test. The results showed an relationship between the level of knowledge about the physiological and psychological changes in premenopausal phase and the level of anxiety in pre-old women with p value = 0.000 (p <0.1). This study recommended that additional studies by increasing the number of samples so that the whole population can be represented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".