MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231753124 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-716-2_2

Life Lessons

2014· book-chapter· en· W4231753124 on OpenAlexaff
Heesoon Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpansivePhenomenonAestheticsPsychologyEpistemologyArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We learn all kinds of things, from the moment we pop into this plane of existence (or even before) till we pop out of it. Learning is a pervasive and expansive phenomenon for humans. But not all learning is the same. Some learning is delightful, joyful, beautiful, and animating; some insightful and mind-expanding; some downright “ wrong” some useless; some boring; some hopeless and depressing; some hurtful and harming. For sure, not all learning is helpful. Helpful learning is an ethical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicMedia, Communication, and EducationFrench-language works237,207