MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231783068 · doi:10.1136/jmg.40.10.746

Transplanting <i>CY282</i> heterozygous livers is risky

2003· article· en· W4231783068 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M Ridanpa ̈a ̈, Leanne M. Ward, Susanna Rockas, Gustavo de Sá Menezes Carvalho, Ma ̈kela ̈, Miki Susic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Genetics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNovo NordiskHelsingin ja Uudenmaan SairaanhoitopiiriCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMarch of Dimes Foundation
KeywordsTransplantingBiologyGeneticsAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Schmid type of metaphyseal chondrodysplasia (MCDS) is generally due to mutations in COL10A1 encoding for type X collagen of cartilage.Methods: We performed a study on the genes coding for the RNA components of RNase MRP (MRPR) and RNase P (H1RNA) among 20 patients with diagnosis of MCDS and no mutations in COL10A1.Results: Two patients were found to be homozygous for a base substitution G for A at nucleotide 70 of RMRP, which is the major mutation causing cartilage-hair hypoplasia.No pathogenic mutations were detected in H1RNA.Conclusion: Cartilage-hair hypoplasia diagnosis should be considered in patients with metaphyseal chondrodysplasia even in the absence of any extra-skeletal manifestations if no mutation in COL10A1 can be found and the family history is compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance.Correct diagnosis is important for genetic counselling and for proper follow up of the patients. The Schmid type of metaphyseal chondrodysplasia (MCDS, OMIM 156500) is characterised by short stature, bowed legs, coxa vara, and specific metaphyseal changes seen in radiographs. 1 2 Autosomal dominant mutations in COL10A1 (OMIM # 120110), which encodes for type X short chain non-fibrillar collagen of cartilage, have been identified in some patients with this phenotype.Most of the mutations reside in the carboxyterminal globular domain (CN1) while two mutations are in a putative signal peptide cleavage site.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Despite thorough mutation screening in COL10A1, no mutations have been identified in a number of MCDS patients.9 10 We have recently reported on 46 RMRP (OMIM # 157660) mutations causing recessively inherited cartilage-hair hypoplasia (CHH, OMIM # 250250), another type of metaphyseal chondrodysplasia.11 12 CHH is characterised clinically by short limbed short stature, hair hypoplasia, defective immunity, and haematological abnormalities, and radiographically by metaphyseal flaring and irregularity.13 14 The untranslated RMRP gene encodes the RNA component of the RNase mitochondrial RNA processing (MRP) complex.Normally, the RNase endoribonuclease MRP complex is involved in multiple cellular and mitochondrial functions but the functional impairment of the RMRP gene product that causes disease remains to be characterised.11 15 Although MCDS and CHH are separate disorders, phenotypes and metaphyseal changes in radiographs can resemble each other.As mutations in the COL10A1 gene explain only part of the MCDS cases, we first hypothesised that the RMRP genotype might play a role.In a search for RMRP mutations in 20 patients with diagnosis of MCDS and no mutations in COL10A1, we found two patients homozygous for the major mutation 70ARG.This finding has further initiated our screening in the same set of patients for mutations in H1RNA, a gene coding for the RNA component of RNase P, another endoribonuclease, which is structurally and functionally similar to RNase MRP. 15

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical GeneticsSame topicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207