Opinion publique et gouvernement royal au Danemark face à la Révolution française (1789-1799)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
David Fumex, Public Opinion and Royal Government in Denmark Confronted with the French Revolution (1789-1799). French revolutionary events had their impact on Denmark, an absolute monarchy marked by a fair degree of freedom of expression. The political debate became more lively as a result. But the royal government took pains to contain that debate within seemly limits. Any attack on Danish absolutism became a chargeable offence. At the outset of the French Revolution, the mood that dominated in Copenhagen was one of benevolence in the reforming circles close to the government. More liberal authors succombed to the enthusiasm. The proclamation of the Republic and the execution of Louis XVI led to a split among those sympathetic to the Revolution. The reformers rejected the event completely, while the liberals radicalized their discourse and the polemical talents of M.-C. Bruun and P-A. Heiberg hit their mark. The capital was also affected by popular unrest. Royal justice then came into its own. Finally, the royal government closed the public debate with its ordinance of 27 September 1799 ending freedom of expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".