MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231834194 · doi:10.1063/1.5030705

Three charges on a plane in a magnetic field: Special trajectories

2018· article· en· W4231834194 on OpenAlexaff
A. M. Escobar-Ruiz, C. A. Escobar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsPhysicsMotion (physics)Plane (geometry)ElectronMagnetic fieldDimension (graph theory)CoulombGeneralizationClassical mechanicsSpace (punctuation)PerpendicularCharge (physics)Field (mathematics)Mathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematicsGeometryPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a generalization and extension of Escobar-Ruiz and Turbiner [J. Math. Phys. 54, 022901 (2013)], the classical dynamics of three non-relativistic Coulomb charges (e1, m1), (e2, m2), and (e3, m3) on the plane placed in a perpendicular constant magnetic field is considered. Special trajectories for which the distances between the charges remain unchanged are presented and their corresponding constants of motion are indicated. For these special trajectories, the number of constants of motion is larger than the dimension of the configuration space and hence they can be called particularly superintegrable. Three physically relevant cases are analyzed in detail, namely, that of three electrons, a neutral system, and a helium-like system. The n-body case is discussed as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207