MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231863954 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-31936/v2

Gene modules and non-coding RNAs involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis through acinar ductal metaplasia 

2020· preprint· en· W4231863954 on OpenAlexaff
Huairong Zhang, Bingyin Shi, Zu‐Hua Gao, BO GAO

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCarcinogenesisCancer researchGeneCrosstalkmicroRNAGene expressionGene expression profilingComputational biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Acinar ductal metaplasia (ADM) is a recently identified precursor lesion that can progress through pancreatic ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the genetic alterations and the transcriptional regulators at work during the process of ADM-driven PDAC tumorigenesis are largely unknown. We applied a multidimensional integration strategy to unveil the gene modules and non-coding RNAs that drive the ADM-PanIN-PDAC process. Methods: GSE40895 and the microarray datasets were integrated to unmask the regulators linked to ADM, PanIN and PDAC. Based on the differentially expressed genes and protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks for each stage, overlapping and crosstalk gene modules in ADM-PanIN-PDAC were identified using the search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes (STRING) and Cytoscape. The functions of these modules were elucidated by gene ontology (GO) analysis. The expression levels of hub genes and survival analysis were investigated in human PDAC via gene expression profiling interactive analysis (GEPIA). The MiRDB database was used to predict potential non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) capable of regulating overlap and crosstalk genes. Results: We found several bridging ADM gene modules (e.g. SMARCA1 and H2AFZ), PanIN gene modules (e.g. HDAC11 and SMARCA2) and PDAC gene modules (e.g. OLFR239 and CLIP3). They were enriched in nucleosome assembly, chromatin organization and G-protein coupled receptor signalling pathways by GO analysis. MicroRNAs (e.g. mmu-miR-335-5p and mmu-miR-669n) and lncRNAs (e.g. H19 and Gm14207) took part in this ample crosstalk by regulating the gene expression. Conclusions: SMARCA1, SMARCA2 and CLIP3 were identified as novel crosstalk genes and potential prognostic biomarkers for ADM-driven PDAC carcinogenesis. After validation in clinical and functional studies, transcriptional regulatory non-coding RNAs targeting crosstalk and overlapping genes could represent effective targets for early PDAC intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207