MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231932469 · doi:10.32792/utq/utjmed/14/2/9

Manual Vaccum Aspiration : An alterative to the standard surgical curettage , First experience in Iraq...

2019· article· en· W4231932469 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Thi-Qar Journal of Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVacuum aspirationIncomplete AbortionCannulaSurgeryProducts of conceptionCurettagePopulationAbortionPregnancyFamily planningMisoprostolResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manual vacuum aspiration ( MVA ) or Karmah Cannula is a soft flexible Cannula invented by Harvey Karman in early 1970s . This can be performed under local anesthesia in the setting of a treatment room and office . The aim of this study: To assess the efficacy of MVA in the management of first trimester early fetal demise , missed abortion up to 13 weeks and incomplete miscarriage, and it if can be used as successful alternative to traditional method of sharp surgical curettage Material and method: This was an interventional prospective study including 200 patients who were scheduled to undergo MVA for 1st trimester early fetal demise and incomplete miscarriage . The study population consist of 200 patients who were diagnosed as having missed abortion by ultrasound abdominal and Trans-vaginal ultrasound. The study conducted between January 2014 – until January 2016 . The efficacy assessed by completion of evacuation evaluated immediately by ultrasound conducted in the same clinic and second look ultrasound after one week of the procedure . Result: Efficacy of the procedure was 99% and incomplete uterine evacuation was seen in 1% of patients . No significant rate of complication like uterine perforation , infection , or excessive vaginal bleeding . More than 99% of cases has a successful procedure and did not required any further surgical or medical treatment 98% of women were satisfied with the procedure and they will recommend it to others . This study proved that MVA is super to the traditional use of D & C with metallic tools by avoidance of hospital stay and general anesthesia and will decrease the daily work load for medical staff. Conclusion : Manual vacuum Aspirator ( MVA ) is safe , effective and minimally invasive procedure with low rate of complication . Moreover , it can be carried our safely and effectively in office or medical clinic and no need for hospital admission , occupying the operating theatre and medical staff involvement. It even cost effective in comparism with surgical dilatation and curettage which is held under general anesthesia in operating theatre of Hospitals . Recommendation: This study may change the traditional use of dilatation and curettage with metallic tools and replaced by MVA with avoiding of general anesthesia and the need for access to the theater

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Thi-Qar Journal of Medicine→Same topicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions→French-language works237,207→