Canada energy and trade woes will disrupt politics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significance Kenney’s comments add fuel to an interprovincial ideological and trade dispute between Alberta and British Columbia over oil and climate change that shows no signs of speedy resolution. It threatens further political difficulty if Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s federal administration is obliged to intervene. The dispute, which is splitting the social democratic New Democratic Party (NDP) which governs Alberta and British Columbia, points to the heated debate between middle-class environmentalists bent on averting climate change and working-class unions anxious to preserve jobs, including in energy. Impacts The United Conservatives are likely to form the next Albertan government. The federal government is likely to intervene through the National Energy Board and courts to save the TMP. Courts will likely rule against British Columbia, setting a precedent. Limited progress on increasing pipeline capacity will cause investors to leave the Alberta oil patch.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.091 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".