MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231939861 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db230280

Canada energy and trade woes will disrupt politics

2018· other· en· W4231939861 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)Administration (probate law)DemocracyIdeologyPublic administrationPolitical economyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Kenney’s comments add fuel to an interprovincial ideological and trade dispute between Alberta and British Columbia over oil and climate change that shows no signs of speedy resolution. It threatens further political difficulty if Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s federal administration is obliged to intervene. The dispute, which is splitting the social democratic New Democratic Party (NDP) which governs Alberta and British Columbia, points to the heated debate between middle-class environmentalists bent on averting climate change and working-class unions anxious to preserve jobs, including in energy. Impacts The United Conservatives are likely to form the next Albertan government. The federal government is likely to intervene through the National Energy Board and courts to save the TMP. Courts will likely rule against British Columbia, setting a precedent. Limited progress on increasing pipeline capacity will cause investors to leave the Alberta oil patch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207