MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231946743 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14651724

A regime switching model with exogenous variables in a study of hedge funds

2021· preprint· en· W4231946743 on OpenAlexaff
Pauline Adamopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsHedge fundMultivariate statisticsEconometricsMarkov chainIndex (typography)Financial economicsFinanceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to investigate the correlation between states of the global economy, and returns of hedge fund indices while assessing exposure to macroeconomic risk factors. States of the economy are assumed to follow a three-state Markov chain, and are estimated using the MSCI World Index; estimated states appear to capture most significant global events. State-dependent exposure to macroeconomic and financial factors is assessed with a multivariate regime-switching model which, is then extended to a multivariate quadratic one. It is concluded that the exposure to any given factor is largely state dependent: different hedge fund indices exhibit exposure to different factors conditional upon the state of the global economy, the ensuing changes in economic indicators, and the changes in capital flows. Furthermore, macroeconomic factors are found to be significant in estimating the returns of hedge fund indices, and quadratic models using both financial and economic factors yield significantly better estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarket Dynamics and Volatility→French-language works237,207→