Analisis Kritis terhadap Eksistensi Bahasa Daerah Makassar sebagai Muatan Lokal di Sekolah Dasar Kota Makassar Pasca Implementasi Kurikulum 2013
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 menuai pro dan kontra di tengah-tengah masyarakat. Akhirnya muncul anggapan bahwa kegagalan penyelenggaraan pendidikan di Indonesia disebabkan oleh kesalahan rancangan kurikulum. Hal tersebut yang menjelaskan mengapa perubahan kurikulum terjadi sejak 1968-2006 telah terjadi sebanyak tujuh kali. Hingga akhirnya disusunlah Kurikulum 2013 untuk menyempurnakan kurikulum tahun-tahun sebelumnya. Makalah ini akan menjelaskan spesifik terhadap dampak yang ditimbulkan atas implementasi kurikulum 2013 dalam mata pelajaran bahasa Makassar sebagai muatan lokal di Sekolah Dasar Kota Makassar. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah teridentifikasinya tiga hal yang menjadi ancaman bagi eksistensi bahasa Daerah/Makassar dalam institusi pendidikan formal, khususnya di Sekolah Dasar: (1) tidak adanya kompetensi dasar untuk mata pelajaran muatan lokal (bahasa Daerah), (2) terintegrasinya bahasa Daerah dalam beberapa Kompetensi Dasar mata pelajaran, dan (3) kontradiksi kurikulum 2013 dengan upaya pemertahanan bahasa Daerah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".