MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232118569 · doi:10.1002/9781119713173.ch5

Numerical Modeling and Simulation

2021· other· en· W4232118569 on OpenAlexaff
İbrahim Dinçer, Marc A. Rosen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes and illustrates various numerical approaches and methods for the modeling, simulation, and analysis of sensible and latent thermal energy storage (TES) systems. It provides a brief overview of several techniques used in typical analyses of TES applications, with an emphasis on numerical simulation. Although the field of TES is broad, most TES research is concerned with space heating or cooling, so this review mostly focuses on these applications. One of the most important aspects of a computational fluid dynamics code is its ability to incorporate governing equations and conservation laws. During TES numerical simulation, governing equations are solved to determine velocity, pressure and temperature fields. Latent TES systems are finding increasing applications due to their high volumetric heat capacities. Encapsulated ice storage systems are an effective type of TES in part because they have a large heat transfer area per unit storage volume, resulting in higher heat transfer rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhase Change Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207