MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232142660 · doi:10.3917/aatc.136.0067

Rencontre avec... Bill Cornell

2010· article· fr· W4232142660 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
France Brécard

Bibliographic record

VenueActualités en analyse transactionnelle/Actualités en analyse transactionnelle · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicTransactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette interview a été réalisée par France Brécard le 25 mars 2010, lors du passage à Paris de Bill. Depuis Bill Cornell a reçu le prix Eric Berne 2010 (EBMA 1 ) pour les articles suivants : - Life Script Theory : A critical review from a developmental perspective. - Babies, brains and bodies : Somatic foundations of the Child ego state. - Impasse and Intimacy. Applying Berne’s concept of script protocol, écrit avec M. Landaiche. (Impasse et intimité dans le travail en thérapie et en conseil : l’influence du protocole. A.A.T., 120, 2006, pp. 11-43). Ce prix lui a été remis à Montréal le 13 août 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActualités en analyse transactionnelle/Actualités en analyse transactionnelleSame topicTransactional Analysis in PsychotherapyFrench-language works237,207