MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232142660 · doi:10.3917/aatc.136.0067

Rencontre avec... Bill Cornell

2010· article· fr· W4232142660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueActualités en analyse transactionnelle/Actualités en analyse transactionnelle · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicTransactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette interview a été réalisée par France Brécard le 25 mars 2010, lors du passage à Paris de Bill. Depuis Bill Cornell a reçu le prix Eric Berne 2010 (EBMA 1 ) pour les articles suivants : - Life Script Theory : A critical review from a developmental perspective. - Babies, brains and bodies : Somatic foundations of the Child ego state. - Impasse and Intimacy. Applying Berne’s concept of script protocol, écrit avec M. Landaiche. (Impasse et intimité dans le travail en thérapie et en conseil : l’influence du protocole. A.A.T., 120, 2006, pp. 11-43). Ce prix lui a été remis à Montréal le 13 août 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.007
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2350.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it