Eurípides e a consciência trágica do limite
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: A nossa condição de seres humanos frente à realidade é, desde a Grécia, uma questão pulsante. Procuramos captar e compreender a multiplicidade das coisas que se nos apresentam e o instrumento que temos para isso é sempre o λόγος; em todos seus inúmeros sentidos. Nesse caso, perguntamo-nos, desde sempre: seria esse λόγος; capaz de exprimir todas as realidades que existem para o ser? Tomando como ponto de partida essa pergunta, procuramos em nosso trabalho analisar alguns aspectos da poesia do último dos trágicos gregos, Eurípides, onde observamos as possibilidades da linguagem frente às realidades possivelmente inexprimíveis.Palavras-chave: Eurípides; tragédia grega; λόγος.Abstract: Our status as human beings confronted with reality has been, since classical Greece, a palpitating question. We try to capture and comprehend the multiplicity of elements that are presented to us, and the tool we have to do is always the λόγος, in all the realities that there are for a given being? Departing from this question, in our work, we try to analyze some aspects in the poetry of the last of tragic Greeks, Euripidis, through wich we observed the possibilities offered by language confronted with realities that are possibly inexpressible.Keywords: Euripidis; Greek tragedy; λόγος.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it