Platinum-group elements in the Pyroxenite Marker, Bushveld Complex: implications for the formation of the Main Zone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concentrations of platinum-group elements and sulphides in the Pyroxenite Marker of the upper Main Zone are variable, but generally low (up to 100 ppb PGE and 0.2 weight % S). The metal patterns may mostly be explained by sulphide segregation from PGE depleted residual Upper Critical Zone magma, but they are inconsistent with sulphide segregation from a replenishing influx of undepleted Critical Zone magma. Instead, we favour a model whereby a relatively cool and dense Main Zone crystal mush intruded the Bushveld chamber during the later stages of the deposition of the Upper Critical Zone and displaced warmer and lighter residual magma depleted in chalcophile metals (Sharpe, 1985). Based on the metal contents and textural evidence such as the occurrence of ophitic textures, we hypothesize that the Pyroxenite Marker formed in response to localized supercooling and the suppression of plagioclase crystallization. The model implies that the layer represents a poor target for PGE mineralization in the upper portions of the Bushveld Complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".