MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4232275091 · doi:10.2523/65513-ms

Horizontal Borehole Stability in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

2000· article· en· W4232275091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jincai Zhang, J.-C. Roegiers

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBoreholeCitationGeologyComputer scienceMining engineeringEngineeringPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Horizontal Borehole Stability in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Jincai Zhang; Jincai Zhang University of Oklahoma Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar J.-C. Roegiers J.-C. Roegiers University of Oklahoma Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2000. Paper Number: SPE-65513-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/65513-MS Published: November 06 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Zhang, Jincai, and J.-C. Roegiers. "Horizontal Borehole Stability in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs." Paper presented at the SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/65513-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology Search Advanced Search AbstractFor modeling naturally fractured reservoirs, the dual-porosity poroelastic model is effective and accurate to characterize stresses as well as flow fields. A generalized plane strain and dual-porosity finite element solution has been developed for analyzing horizontal borehole stability. Two kinds of failure criteria (spalling and collapse) were included. Results show that horizontal borehole stability depends strongly on the in situ stress state, the borehole orientation, time, mud pressure and fracture characteristics.IntroductionBorehole stability is a very important issue in the gas and oil industry as it can result in substantial expenditures having thus a significant impact on reservoir production. Stability of circular openings has been considered and studied in different contexts by many disciplines. New challenges have also emerged since it became necessary to study borehole stability for horizontal and inclined boreholes, boreholes drilled in poorly consolidated formations, boreholes in naturally fractured media and in very deep formations. The borehole stability problem can be considered by separating the potential rock failure mechanisms into the following four categories (Roegiers, 1990)1:Failures related to pre-existing or drilling-induced formation damage;Failures caused by induced stress concentrations;Failures attributed to deliberate or unintentional additional stresses; and,Failures related to shock-wave loading.More than 90 percent of horizontal wells have open-hole completions2. In order to control borehole instability, prepacked gravelpacks, wire-wrapped screens, and slotted liners have been used, while pre-perforated liners are usually run to prevent hole collapse3. Because of high perforation and stimulation costs, horizontal wells are cased and cemented only when wellbore and formation problems are not remediable under open-hole completion scenarios.Traditionally, borehole stability analyses were based either on elasticity or on the poroelasticity theory, in which the host rocks around the borehole are assumed to be homogeneous. However, such solutions may result in erroneous conclusions for naturally fractured porous media because the fractures introduce important heterogeneities.In this paper, a dual-porosity fluid flow and deformation system, including fractures and intervening porous blocks, is considered. For modeling three-dimensional engineering structures featuring elongated shapes, such as boreholes, etc., the pseudo-three-dimensional generalized plane strain method is more effective and accurate to characterize the rock deformations and fluid flow than the classical plane strain approach. A generalized plane strain finite element solution was, therefore, developed for analyzing borehole stability problems.For a specific case, the calculated results demonstrate that the borehole failure becomes time-dependent. The stability not only depends on the magnitudes of original stresses, but also on the orientation of the borehole. The results also show that the mud weight of the drilling fluid is an important factor to control any instability.Generalized Plane Strain ConceptMost problems, such as, wellbores, tunnels and dikes are characterized by a cross-sectional geometry that is usually invariant along their longitudinal direction. These problems are defined as pseudo-two-dimensional, or belonging to the generalized plane strain category. In such problems, material anisotropy and three-dimensional stress and strain state can be considered, but they have a functional dependence on only two spatial variables4. Therefore, only a two-dimensional domain discretization is needed for numerical solutions. Keywords: petroleum society, borehole stability, mpa, borehole orientation, borehole, instability, complex reservoir, fractured reservoir, fracture, horizontal borehole stability Subjects: Reservoir Characterization, Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, Reservoir geomechanics, Naturally-fractured reservoirs This content is only available via PDF. 2000. SPE/PS-CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→