MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232279057 · doi:10.4095/219894

A Robust Approach for Estimating LAI from Landsat TM/ETM+ Imagery

2002· report· en· W4232279057 on OpenAlexaffabout
C. BUTSON, Richard Fernandes, R Latifovic, Wenjun Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingThematic MapperSatellite imageryEnvironmental scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leaf area index (LAI) is a quantitative measure of vegetation cover and of use in models of carbon, water and energy budgets. The recent availability of well-calibrated coverages of Landsat ETM+ imagery over large areas offers an opportunity for production of LAI estimates at fine spatial resolution. Empirical regressions between LAI and selected vegetation indices are applied to propagate uncertainties in calibration and atmospheric correction into LAI retrieval errors. Furthermore, the sensitivity to land cover mixtures is assessed by comparing retrievals with Landsat scale land cover with a 1km land cover product. A single Canada-wide composite of LAI derived from available Landsat ETM+ imagery is produced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207