Emergency interventions for hyperkalaemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To summarize randomized and quasi‐randomized controlled trials of acute interventions (calcium, insulin, beta‐2 agonists, bicarbonate, ion‐exchange resins and dialysis) in the treatment of patients with hyperkalaemia, with respect to the outcomes: serum potassium; ECG changes; arrhythmia; adverse effects of therapy; and death. To identify whether the addition of beta‐2 agonists to IV insulin is safe (few adverse effects) and effective (results in greater lowering of serum potassium than IV insulin alone). To identify whether the addition of IV insulin to beta‐2 agonists is safe (few adverse effects) and effective (results in greater lowering of serum potassium than beta‐2 agonists alone). To identify whether the addition of sodium bicarbonate to other agents of combinations is safe (few adverse effects) and effective (results in greater lowering of serum potassium than other agents or combinations alone). To identify areas in which further investigation is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.041 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.087 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".