MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232358961 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.4398232

Vision-based Segmentation of Continuous Mechanomyographic Grasping Sequences for Training Multifunction Prostheses

2006· article· en· W4232358961 on OpenAlexafffund
Natasha Alves, Tom Chau

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionData acquisitionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In designing mechanomyographic (MMG) signal classifiers for prosthetic control, the acquisition of long, continuous streams of MMG signals is typically preferred over the painstaking collection of individual, isolated contractions. However, a major challenge with continuous collection is the subsequent separation of the MMG data stream into segments representing individual contractions. This paper proposes an automatic, vision-based segmentation method for continuously recorded MMG data streams. MMG data acquisition was synchronized with transverse plane video acquisition of functional grip sequences. The automatic segmentation system can track a hand, recognize grips and detect grip transition times as well as extraneous hand movements. The system recognizes two grips with an average accuracy of 97.8plusmn4%, and seven grips with an accuracy of 73plusmn20%. The contraction initiation and termination times agree closely (within 1.3plusmn1 frames) with values obtained manually

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207