MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232367407 · doi:10.14740/jmc2827w

Pregnant With Myocardial Infarction, How Should I Manage?

2017· article· en· W4232367407 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emin Uysal, Süleyman Solak, Şakir Ömür Hıncal, Sinan Varol

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionChest painThrombusEmergency departmentGestationPregnancySurgeryCardiologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myocardial infarction (MI) during pregnancy is rare but has important risks for the mother and the fetus. Its prevalence is 1/10,000 - 30,000. A 38-year-old woman at the 37th gestation week was admitted to the emergency department with the complaint of chest pain. She had undergone mitral valve replacement previously. Her electrocardiograph and clinic are in line with ST elevation inferior MI. A thrombus was identified by angiography at posterolateral of circumflex artery. The patient was followed up with medical treatment, and she had normal birth without any complications. The mother and the baby were discharged from hospital to their home after the follow-up period. In conclusion, emergency intervention should be considered for the pregnant women with MI that can be rare but fatal for the mother and the baby. J Med Cases. 2017;8(5):167-169 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc2827w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207