MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232370400 · doi:10.1002/9780470057339.van005

Natural Disasters

2001· other· en· W4232370400 on OpenAlex
A.G. Davenport, G.A. Kopp

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Environmetrics · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVulnerability (computing)HazardNatural disasterNatural hazardNatural (archaeology)GeographyPopulationSocial vulnerabilityEnvironmental planningEnvironmental healthComputer securityComputer scienceMeteorologyEcologyPsychologyPsychological resilienceMedicineBiologyArchaeologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Natural disasters are the interaction of naturally occurring hazards with human population. Natural disasters are often defined in social and economic terms, one common definition being that the community involved cannot recover without external help. Meteorologist Joseph Golden of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says that ‘a hazard only becomes a disaster when it occurs where people live’. Where people live is an important aspect of natural disasters because it defines the vulnerability to natural hazards. According to Flageollet, ‘vulnerability is often assessed in terms of the probable cost of the damage the hazard has done or may do’. The risk of a natural disaster is a combination of both the hazard and the vulnerability to the hazard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it