MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232396075 · doi:10.14740/jnr509

Polyamines in Parkinson’s Disease: Their Role in Oxidative Stress Induction and Protein Aggregation

2019· article· en· W4232396075 on OpenAlex
M. G. Makletsova, Sergei P. Syatkin, В.В. Полещук, Guzel R. Urazgildeeva, Larisa A. Chigaleychik, Christina Y. Sungrapova, С. Н. Иллариошкин

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPutrescineSperminePolyamineSubstantia nigraOxidative stressPolyamine oxidaseSpermidineDopaminergicCell biologyCadaverineChemistryBiochemistryDopamineBiologyNeuroscienceEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a systemic neurodegenerative disease characterized by tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and stooping posture. When more than 60% of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the brain have died, motor symptoms manifest in PD. Currently, oxidative stress (OS) is considered to be one of the leading factors provoking death of dopaminergic neurons in PD. This review is concerned with the role of polyamines in PD, especially focusing on their role in OS induction. Polyamines (putrescine, cadaverine, spermidine and spermine) are involved in many molecular mechanisms, including cell proliferation and differentiation, gene transcription and translation, modulation of the functional activity of ion channels and receptors, and other vital processes. It is worth noting that under physiological conditions polyamines are antioxidants. It has been shown that spermine oxidase (SMOX) is up-regulated in PD, activating polyamine breakdown, which leads to excessive formation of toxic aldehydes (such as acrolein), H 2 O 2 (a strong cytostatic) and ammonia (a toxic substance). Polyamines are also involved in the pathogenetic mechanism of α-synuclein modification resulting in the formation of Lewy bodies. This review provides data on the changes in polyamine levels at later stages of the disease. The review also examines the role of polyamines, as gliotransmitters, in regulating neural function and vice versa. The mechanisms of polyamine “pumping” from neurons to glia can be considered factors of OS regulation in neurons. Prolonged accumulation of polyamines in glia can lead to oxidation of polyamines and therefore potentially to gliosis in PD. The exact mechanisms of this process are, however, not clear. Answering the questions regarding the role of polyamines in gliosis development and pathogenesis of PD is necessary for treating cognitive impairment in patients with PD, which is particularly important. J Neurol Res. 2019;9(1-2):1-7 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr509

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it