Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diplomatic recognition is the public acknowledgment by one sovereign and independent state of the existence of another sovereign and independent state. Recognition is voluntary and is largely a political decision, although it has ramifications in international law. Both states accept the duties, responsibilities, and privileges embraced in the treaty obligations codified in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961). Recognition of the state is regarded as permanent; recognition of the government may change with differing circumstances. Turbulent events that change the form of government may cause the sending country to reconsider recognition of the receiving state by withholding recognition or extending conditional recognition until such time as the sending state is satisfied that the receiving state meets its specific requirements. International law does not speak to the correctness or legality of any form of changed government. Many countries refuse to address the question of the form of government of the receiving state and consider primarily the extent to which the receiving state exercises effective control over its territory. The objective of diplomatic recognition is the establishment of effective relations between two countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it